Friday, December 28, 2012
Included in the article, among others, is an image of Monument Valley Navajo Tribal Park which Tim used to illustrate how his approach to post processing has changed. That reminded me of our “Southwest Canyon Crawl” in September of 2004.
That May I bought my first digital camera — a Canon S1 IS. It was somewhere between a DSLR and a point-and-shoot, featuring a whopping 3.2 megapixel sensor, 10x optical zoom, LCD viewfinder that flips forward and rotates 270° (great for taking candid shots), and a full manual mode.
Along with Monument Valley, we visited Zion Canyon:
and the Grand Canyon — This is the North Rim:
When I look back on my initial attempts to “touch up” my photos from that trip, I realize that I may have “overcooked” some of them. I attribute that, in part, to the simple fact that I had no idea what I was doing or really trying to achieve. In addition, my first editing software was Adobe Photoshop 7® which is not what I would call a particularly intuitive tool to use.
Here’s the out-of-the-camera shot of one of the buttes in Monument Valley:
Here’s what it looked like after I hacked away at it with Photoshop 7®:
And here’s what it looks like with some minor adjustments in Lightroom®:
It’s just so tempting and easy, and fun! But, where does one draw the line, if at all? Does it matter if the resulting image has no real connection with the original? For me, it depends.
When I submit an image to a microstock site, I know that I need to be very selective about my edits. I’ll add a bit of sharpening, adjust the levels, remove some noise and perhaps extraneous objects if I can get away with it, but that’s about it. Otherwise, the reviewers will reject it as having been over-processed and it will have been a wasted effort.
However, if I’m posting to this blog, or putting up a new gallery on petermarble.com, I allow myself far more latitude in terms of the adjustments I make.
I know there are some people out there who claim that a “real” photographer doesn’t need to do any post-processing. Personally I feel that anything goes, whether it’s using a split neutral-density filter before pressing the shutter release, or Lightroom’s graduated filter during post-processing to darken the sky. Either way, as a photographer you make a conscious decision that affects the final image. Who is to say what is too much processing? It is totally subjective.
Tuesday, December 4, 2012
First: the Runner-up
The lucky runner-up is Melinda from Austin, Texas. And, although Melinda clearly didn’t quite fully grasp the basic concept of the challenge, i.e., we were talking about ducks, not swans or dogs, I say: “close enough”.
As I understand it, Melinda’s dog, Prince, was happily chasing a tennis ball on Lady Bird Lake in Austin and minding his own business when a swan got a tad too close.
Warning: Some viewers may find the following images disturbing.
Prince then decided that swans are more fun than tennis balls and so, the chase began.
Eventually, Prince closed the gap and the swan made its escape.
And Now: the Winner!
The winner of the prestigious “I’ll Show You My Duck if You Show Me Yours” challenge is Carolyn from Campbellville.
Here’s her winning photo of two ducks fighting (I prefer to think of them as playing):
- Camera: Nikon D7000 – (See Lessons Learned with my D7000)
- Lens: 70-200 f/2.8 – lucky you!
- Exposure: 1/800 sec at f /3.2
- Exposure Program: Manual
Thanks for Playing!